Were Hessians Really Mercenaries?
Written by
Categories: Modern

Were Hessians Really Mercenaries?

grassy pastures separated by woods on a cool cloudy day
On these plains above Jena in 1806, the Prussian army was having a really bad day. Photo by Sean Manning, October 2016

In my first book, I talked about how ‘mercenary’ is more a moral and political term than a neutral category. People use different names like allies, volunteers, professionals, Private Military Companies, and mercenaries depending on their moral and political stance on those soldiers (in ancient Greece or Sir Charles Oman’s England, this was deeply tied up in aristocratic suspicion of anyone who had to work for a living). A year or two ago, military historian Alex Burns made a similar point about Hessian soldiers in the American Revolutionary War.

There are many myths regarding the revolutionary war, but none seem as hard to eradicate as the idea that the “Hessians” were “mercenaries”. Today’s post isn’t for the fully initiated: if you are familiar with the story of the German Subsidientruppen in the American War of Independence, there might be some new material for you. By and large, however, this post is aimed at those who are unfamiliar with the story of these German-speaking soldiers, and why they made the decision to travel to America. 

Imagine you are a soldier in the United States Army, serving in West Germany during the Cold War. You are stationed there because of longstanding agreements and alliances, which stretch back decades. The United States Government and the West German government have a financial understanding that helps maintain your presence in the region. Are you a mercenary? The situation was very similar for the German-speaking soldiers who fought in the American War of Independence, They had a longstanding relationship with Great Britain, stretching back decades. They had fought with alongside the British since the 1690s, both in continental Europe and in the British isles. As a result of the Hanoverian succession in 1714 (the British Royal family was drawn from Hanover) they had longstanding marriage connections with Great Britain. Horace Walpole, a British politician from the 1730s, referred to the Hessians as the Triarii of Great Britain. 

These soldiers did not personally or corporately take on contracts from the British. they were members of state militaries: their governments were paid a subsidy by the British in order to fight in their wars. Frederick II (the Great) of Prussia, received subsidies from the British during the Seven Years War. As a result, the modern German term for these troops is Subsidientruppen, or subsidy troops. Thus, it might be better to speak of the German-speaking subsidy troops, as opposed to calling them Hessians, or mercenaries. Historians have argued that it might be fitting to call their countries “mercenary states”. This is different from saying they were mercenaries. 

Alex Burns, “Were Hessians Really Mercenaries?” Kabinettskriege: An Eighteenth-Century Digital Humanities Project http://kabinettskriege.blogspot.com/2022/04/were-hessians-really-mercenaries.html

I would just note that ‘Hessians’ seems to be a period term, and is no worse than calling Welsh, Northern Irish, Scots, and English all Englander. Jeffrey Rop has argued that by the fourth century BCE, large forces of Greek ‘mercenaries’ were usually recruited after negotiations with their home city or league. Picking the wrong side could be dangerous for a little Greek polis, and other powers might take advantage if too many soldiers were away from home. So the city from which soldiers were recruited wanted a say in who did the recruiting.

Burns has another story which some contemporary soldiers could do with hearing.

The subsidy troops had been used in messy civil conflicts before. Hessian troops were used against the Jacobites in 1745-6, where they remarkably refused to take part in the repression against the Scottish Jacobites. Their troops were remembered in Perthshire, Scotland, as “a gentle race,” and their commanding Prince (Friedrich II) declared, “My Hessians and I have been called to fight the enemies of the British crown, but never will we consent to hang or torture in its name.” (Duffy, Best of Enemies, p. 133).

Keep those subsidies flowing so I don’t have to leave the history wars with donations on Patreon or elsewhere.

(scheduled 26 November 2023)

paypal logo
patreon logo

5 thoughts on “Were Hessians Really Mercenaries?

  1. russell1200 says:

    They are very traditional mercenaries. The post-WW2 mercenary is often seen as this soldier of fortune type signing up with whomever will pay them the most.

    But traditional mercenaries often signed up with a traditional political unit with an understanding that they might be sent off to fight somewhere else. In a conflict that had nothing to do with the polity they signed up with: thus being different than a US soldier stationed in Berlin to support his allies. Your typical Greek Mercenary often fit in this category.

    The introduction of the Hessians indicates that the Crown is going to use violence and warlike methods. It is similar to their bombarding small towns on the New England Coast. It is upping the ante.

    However, no discussion of Hessians should do without bringing up Sleepy Hollow.
    THE GALLOPING HESSIAN OF THE HOLLOW:
    THE SEARCH FOR EARLY AMERICAN
    IDENTITY THROUGH FOREIGN
    MERCENARIES
    https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/kd17cv93j pdf)

    1. Sean says:

      Members of the US military are likely to be sent to a random poor hot country for reasons that nobody can quite explain or agree on, often because of pressure from countries which are in some sense ‘US allies.’ But nobody calls US servicemembers ‘mercenaries’ because they may be ordered to act as proxies in a war within the Middle East or Latin America. Its understood that states get into wars and stay in wars for all kinds of reasons, and if you enlist then you go where they send you.

    2. Sean says:

      I suspect that Burns is using a definition of “mercenary” based on the laws of armed conflict. Other people use “mercenary” as essentially the same as “any paid volunteer soldier” but I think that sense is not helpful given that most of us have to sell our labour to someone we would not work for gratis. Xenophon and Sir Charles Oman were leisured propertyowners who could be snobby about people who had to work for a living (“I never accepted pay from Cyrus, I just went along for fun”)

  2. Ryan says:

    I forgot where I heard that the Hessians weren’t really mercenaries, but it may have been in school. How common are real mercenaries of the soldier of fortune type?

    1. Sean says:

      I don’t know! You get wandering armies like the Great Companies in the 14th century. I think the Grand Catalan Company started out fighting for the King of Aragon and then he let the Byzantines hire them when he made peace and did not want thousands of underemployed thugs in his territory. And you get small numbers of lost, violent, or ideological men drifting to wherever there is fighting, like poor Jordan Goudreau. In the ancient world we rarely have sources for people like him, and more for the big contracts with thousands of men or one very experienced and well-connected Spartiate.

      A lot of cases which Rop discusses were probably like Blackwater recruiting in the USA in the oughties, or the Canadian authorities trying to discourage the Mackenzie-Papineau battalion from recruiting in the 1930s. There was not necessarily a discussion of who they would hire, but of roughly how many and who they would be fighting.

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.